Oh, I'm sure it will too, but from what it sounds like kyburg thinks, she thinks they will throw something like Prop 8 on the ballot.
Something like Prop 8 would never fly here (at least from what I understand) seeing as there is no "ballot initiative" process here as it is in California. (the process drove me crazy near the end...)
And from what I read of what you posted, the IA Supreme Court pretty much said: It's okay for religious orgs not to support it but the institution of civil marriage is open to everyone.
What I do not understand are the arguments that say that this will "erode the institution of marriage". Umm... what about the people who are married for like 55 hours, or have married and divorced so many times that they have enough surnames to make up their own phone book. *facepalm* How is THAT not eroding the so-called "sanctity of marriage"...
no subject
Something like Prop 8 would never fly here (at least from what I understand) seeing as there is no "ballot initiative" process here as it is in California. (the process drove me crazy near the end...)
And from what I read of what you posted, the IA Supreme Court pretty much said: It's okay for religious orgs not to support it but the institution of civil marriage is open to everyone.
What I do not understand are the arguments that say that this will "erode the institution of marriage". Umm... what about the people who are married for like 55 hours, or have married and divorced so many times that they have enough surnames to make up their own phone book. *facepalm* How is THAT not eroding the so-called "sanctity of marriage"...