![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Good point -
One of my old-timers, ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
the_alchemist, makes a very valid point this morning:
On the one hand, I don't see any reason why heterosexual relationships should be given special legal privileges over homosexual ones, but on the other, I don't see why sexual relationships should be given special legal privileges over non-sexual ones.
A very valid point, indeed. As it's has been popular to mention when talking about same-sex marriage, it's not about the sex. So what's it all about?
Discuss.
Oh, and if that's not enough for you?theferrett is have a free-for-all over at his place over If you're dressed like that, can't I think you're hot? Of course, does one need to wear a burka if you're NOT on the meat market?
Oh. And this?
Ew.
the_alchemist, makes a very valid point this morning:On the one hand, I don't see any reason why heterosexual relationships should be given special legal privileges over homosexual ones, but on the other, I don't see why sexual relationships should be given special legal privileges over non-sexual ones.
A very valid point, indeed. As it's has been popular to mention when talking about same-sex marriage, it's not about the sex. So what's it all about?
Discuss.
Oh, and if that's not enough for you?
theferrett is have a free-for-all over at his place over If you're dressed like that, can't I think you're hot? Of course, does one need to wear a burka if you're NOT on the meat market?Oh. And this?
Ew.
no subject
As for the other thing...it's not about sex, but it IS about THE sex of the people involved.
At this rate in my life, though, it seems like Boston Marriage of the platonic type might be the way I end up going.
*sigh*
C.
no subject