For ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
riverheart:
Mar. 12th, 2004 07:00 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
kyburgA US woman who allegedly ignored medical warnings to have a Caesarean section has been charged with murder after one of her twins was stillborn. From the BBC - of course.
eyelid, zpdiduda - the news story claims "a nurse heard -" the defendent claim this or that. Last time I checked, that was heresay. It still is, isn't it?
I expect this to fall apart if the charting wasn't done exactly to spec, if this is the evidence they plan to present. Doctor, I hope you charted that you advised a caesarean section and she refused it.
The woman'd had two sections prior? Looking at the picture, I'd say the woman has enough children, don't you?
And she has a husband, right? So far, nobody would know one way or the other. Anybody from Utah want to lay odds on whether or not HE had something to say about it?
Much discussion, indeed.
eyelid, zpdiduda - the news story claims "a nurse heard -" the defendent claim this or that. Last time I checked, that was heresay. It still is, isn't it?I expect this to fall apart if the charting wasn't done exactly to spec, if this is the evidence they plan to present. Doctor, I hope you charted that you advised a caesarean section and she refused it.
The woman'd had two sections prior? Looking at the picture, I'd say the woman has enough children, don't you?
And she has a husband, right? So far, nobody would know one way or the other. Anybody from Utah want to lay odds on whether or not HE had something to say about it?
Much discussion, indeed.
