Not surprised.
May. 26th, 2009 10:10 amHalf a loaf, and far from done.
Prop 8 stands, but so do all the marriages performed prior.
Yup, another ballot measure and another nasty fight. Oh, and expensive too. Hooray.
Dumb as dead cats.
Prop 8 stands, but so do all the marriages performed prior.
Yup, another ballot measure and another nasty fight. Oh, and expensive too. Hooray.
Dumb as dead cats.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:39 pm (UTC)I bolded what amounts to similar passages to the way the court ruled.
The only HUGE difference between Prop 8 and the Exclusion Act? The Chinese Exclusion Act was FEDERAL Law. Prop 8 is not.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 05:54 pm (UTC)What the fuck.
I'm officially through paying attention to californian politics. 2003 recall was bad, the fight over the giant hunk of jesus metal in San Diego was worse, and this... well... Yeah.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 06:10 pm (UTC)clearly my moron filters work too well, because i'd like to know about something that sounds this silly.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 08:27 pm (UTC)heck, i'd have done that myself.
Jesus Metal
Date: 2009-05-27 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 06:11 pm (UTC)but i guess some people just need to seek the wrong kind of attention.
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:47 pm (UTC)In a nutshell, it's an attack on a way of life, and we all know people are resistant to change.
I too disagree with Gay Marriage, I think it should have stayed at Civil Unions... it didn't seem anyone had issue with that and it's basically the same thing. Just my opinion.
Sweet Wahuu icon, by the way.
Date: 2009-05-27 12:40 am (UTC)see, while the biggest, most influental belief system in the US might oppose it, there's a lot of smaller ones that don't seem to care from what i've read. there's just nothing in them about it to say "nope, you can't get two guys together", so it's pretty much up to their priests (or whatever they have) to decide if they want to do that.
except with this the state has to step in and say "you can't do that because religion is against it."
no subject
Date: 2009-05-26 10:39 pm (UTC)Of course, there will be another ballot measure now to repel it. The question Californians should ask themselves though is should there be a system in place that allows the state constitution to be changed so easily; a lot of states don't have this type method in there constitution. Just a thought.