Re: Have you read the actual ruling?

Date: 2009-05-29 02:18 am (UTC)
kuangning: (0)
From: [personal profile] kuangning
That was my take too; the CSC basically went "We have to take away the word marriage because of Prop 8, but we're not touching the state of *being* married, the state will just have to call it something else for same-sex couples. Except those 18,000 who got in before this and are grandfathered in. Oh, and by the way? Their civil unions? They still have to be de-facto marriages with all the rights of marriages under state law, even if the state can't call it that. You get the word though; enjoy your win."
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kyburg: (Default)
kyburg

March 2021

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 28th, 2025 02:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios