Re: um - no.

Date: 2009-11-12 10:56 pm (UTC)
ext_20420: (0)
I'm more right than you are.

Thank you for making clear your continued interest in this discussion.

...

For the record, no. Not so much.

(I, at least gave your sources the benefit of the doubt. I don't have the resources to either validate or debunk them. That, I leave to snopes.com - in a pinch - and your sites are clearinghouses for data. I couldn't - by myself - hope to say yea or nay one way or the other.)

Don't tell me what I've experienced, toots. I'm the one who lives here. And keep your dirty feet out of my head.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kyburg: (Default)
kyburg

March 2021

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios