Oh, and one more thing -
Nov. 15th, 2004 04:43 pmSo am I.
Yes, I know I have a number of other faiths represented on my friends list. I am so NOT threatened it's pathetic. You know this.
To me, the epitomy of religious dickishness is making the automatic assumption that prayers are not all going the same place - just because all the "proper forms" aren't being observed.
As for the basic divinity of Jesus Christ - consider for a moment. What would you need to convince a bunch of Jews and Arabs that there really was a God who wanted them to love one another instead of killing one another?
God ain't stupid, peeps.
And I really don't think "my" group was the only one spoken to. We were spoken to. That's enough for me.
We're very flawed creatures, after all. And we don't listen very well - transcribe very well - and are always expecting the worst out of each other.
Look for where we come together - instead of where we come apart at the seams.
Where everyone meets - that's where you'll find your proof. Proof of what?
That there really is something bigger, better, smarter and capable of acceptance and love grander than one can imagine.
All you need is a little faith.
Yes, I know I have a number of other faiths represented on my friends list. I am so NOT threatened it's pathetic. You know this.
To me, the epitomy of religious dickishness is making the automatic assumption that prayers are not all going the same place - just because all the "proper forms" aren't being observed.
As for the basic divinity of Jesus Christ - consider for a moment. What would you need to convince a bunch of Jews and Arabs that there really was a God who wanted them to love one another instead of killing one another?
God ain't stupid, peeps.
And I really don't think "my" group was the only one spoken to. We were spoken to. That's enough for me.
We're very flawed creatures, after all. And we don't listen very well - transcribe very well - and are always expecting the worst out of each other.
Look for where we come together - instead of where we come apart at the seams.
Where everyone meets - that's where you'll find your proof. Proof of what?
That there really is something bigger, better, smarter and capable of acceptance and love grander than one can imagine.
All you need is a little faith.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 10:03 pm (UTC)I was able to spend a little money on myself - that was nice.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 08:03 am (UTC)Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 07:27 pm (UTC)My vote was for a great big black slab of rock that sent out subconcious signals, but I was overruled. "It's been done," they said. "Why don't we try a self-righteous religious zealot, arm him with a lot of smarmy rhetoric, a few hallmark platitudes, shaky logic and some 'jes folks' didactic aphorisms? That's BOUND to work!"
... I'd say it was ultimately more of a "qualified success", at best. I guess Christ just didn't have the gift for that sort of thing you do.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 10:04 pm (UTC)What?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 07:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 08:32 am (UTC)What I have problems with is the idea that you have to have faith in something supernatural in order to behave decently toward your fellow humans -- that faith is somehow a prerequisite for morality. I have even more problems with the idea that some particular bag of unsupported beliefs is the only valid one, There seem to be a lot of people in the Bush administration who share that idea.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:18 pm (UTC)Also, you have to be scared witless to be properly motivated.
Uh, no.
You find "fundamentalism" in any faith - I tend to call it "literalism" more often.
I don't call them Christians - though they very well may be. I call them "nutjobs" - which is more accurate, at least from my perspective.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 09:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:20 pm (UTC)*laughs* Maybe that's not the right term to use here....