Resources -
Oct. 31st, 2007 09:40 amI'll admit, autism as a childhood issue? Scares the beejesus out of me because I don't understand it. It's in the news a lot right now as recommendations are now coming out that all children - all - get screened for Autism Spectrum Disorders twice by age two.
Nifty. But what are they screening for? What's normal? (Because, to be frank? The chatter I hear about it sounds familiar. Like, I went to school with classrooms full of kids who likely had some kind of ASD and never spent a day in a therapist's office. Evar.)
Wonder no longer. Florida State University (yes, the guys who put Terri Schiavo's CAT scans on the web as part of a class taught on medical ethics) is back, with side-by-side videos where you can see for yourself - typical - and 'at risk.'
http://www.autismspeaks.org/video/glossary.php
You'll need IE - Firefox not supported yet. Surprise.
Adoptive children who have been institutionalized? Oh, you can expect a lot of this to look much the same - initially. Some kids will show both RAD and PDD - oh, very yes. It's been made very clear - be prepared.
This is great for me. I now know what to look for, at least. And when. Side by side.
Nifty. But what are they screening for? What's normal? (Because, to be frank? The chatter I hear about it sounds familiar. Like, I went to school with classrooms full of kids who likely had some kind of ASD and never spent a day in a therapist's office. Evar.)
Wonder no longer. Florida State University (yes, the guys who put Terri Schiavo's CAT scans on the web as part of a class taught on medical ethics) is back, with side-by-side videos where you can see for yourself - typical - and 'at risk.'
http://www.autismspeaks.org/video/glossary.php
You'll need IE - Firefox not supported yet. Surprise.
Adoptive children who have been institutionalized? Oh, you can expect a lot of this to look much the same - initially. Some kids will show both RAD and PDD - oh, very yes. It's been made very clear - be prepared.
This is great for me. I now know what to look for, at least. And when. Side by side.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 05:11 pm (UTC)More of an identified need means more resources. And for something they currently are estimating is a 1 in 150 (up from 1 in 167 a year ago) occurrence, that can't be bad.
Remember, this is Florida. They kind of hit people over the head with a nuke when they want to make a point about something.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 05:15 pm (UTC)You might be interested in looking over this blog, if you haven't seen it before, btw.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 05:23 pm (UTC)And then you'll get your kid and never need it again.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-31 11:32 pm (UTC)You need real info on this? I happen to know an expert.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 06:54 pm (UTC)You adopt, you accept that your child is going to have some level of attachment issue. Always. Think a moment. Your adoptive child, regardless of age, has had their connection to their biological parent severed - traumatically, even. (My daughter from China? Will have been abandoned by her parents and then been in institutional care for however long after that.)
Over 6,000 kids a year from China alone. You'd hear more about RAD if it was that destructive by itself.
You also hear about the adoptive parents who got jailed when they found their children (most adopted out of foster care) in cages. You can see how you can get there, neh? (It's still WRONG in all kinds of ways.)
That said, a child that hits continuously? Is not normal. A child that bites that frequently? Is not safe in the general population. And it can happen for any number of reasons, besides adoption - I would have some very strong concerns for anyone being left to fend for themselves alone with children that at-risk for violent behavior. I believe the ratio is never more than 2 to 1; at least here in California, that's the recommended ratio. Five minutes? That's enough time to pick up the child and call 911, say I.
I'm also not in favor of allowing that kind of behavior to continue, naturally. While I won't strike a child - you would need to find something age-appropriate to 1) get the message across that won't be tolerated and 2) protect yourself and the community. Wonder what they use...I'm thinking mouthguards.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-01 06:57 pm (UTC)If your expert wants to weigh in on the latest stuff, that would be more than welcome.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-02 12:30 am (UTC)I wouldn't presume to say I could get someone an appointment for a diagnosis, but if you've got a specific concern, I could get a pretty authoritative answer.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-02 03:09 am (UTC)I would imagine so! *tucks away*