Some kind of wonderful -
Nov. 19th, 2008 09:11 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You'll hear me rant about overmedication a lot - well, it's a sore point. Giving pills is cheap - compared to long-term talk counseling with active therapy. Trouble is, the pills stop working. Oh, you can cycle through a ton of stuff - it's out there - but the expensive, labor-intensive-with-a-real-person is where long term results lie (unless you're one of the people who truly HAVE a chemical issue, and one of the hallmarks of THAT is the pills don't stop working and you don't have to cycle, yadda ya).
Then I hear about Cymbalta. Holy chrome. This stuff is being prescribed off-label right, left and center for things OTHER than depression...and damn if it isn't doing some incredible things, mostly related to pain relief (and we all know I think that's going to be HUGE when it happens).
But for depression? *wiggles hand* Not so much. Read about coming off it and UH.
...and so many, many reports are from people who came to this medication because - you guessed it - they needed to cycle from something else.
I have to wonder about what this all about - and if the cycling is a Good Thing, or a sign that this is not the right way to treat depression, period.
Yeah, maybe I do more than wonder. Like - NO.
Here's a thought for the day - isn't it still addiction when it's legal and you don't have to worry about getting it on a daily basis? You go without and you're not going to feel good, yanno. But get your drug and everything is fine.
What makes that okay?
As for me, I'll pass. And yes, I know that's a privilege.
Then I hear about Cymbalta. Holy chrome. This stuff is being prescribed off-label right, left and center for things OTHER than depression...and damn if it isn't doing some incredible things, mostly related to pain relief (and we all know I think that's going to be HUGE when it happens).
But for depression? *wiggles hand* Not so much. Read about coming off it and UH.
...and so many, many reports are from people who came to this medication because - you guessed it - they needed to cycle from something else.
I have to wonder about what this all about - and if the cycling is a Good Thing, or a sign that this is not the right way to treat depression, period.
Yeah, maybe I do more than wonder. Like - NO.
Here's a thought for the day - isn't it still addiction when it's legal and you don't have to worry about getting it on a daily basis? You go without and you're not going to feel good, yanno. But get your drug and everything is fine.
What makes that okay?
As for me, I'll pass. And yes, I know that's a privilege.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 06:25 pm (UTC)That being said, I am lucky that I had help when I needed it. I would probably still be on medications if I had not both medication and therapy and the will to be medication free at the end of my treatment.
Of course, this is just my opinion.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 06:43 pm (UTC)ETA: Also this "feeling okay with it and not without" == addiction is the same kind of thinking that lost me a decade of my life to crippling pain before someone had the mercy to give me something for it. It's not addiction. And it is just fine to take medication to help you survive.
ETA2: Actually, it's not just pretty offensive. It's really offensive. Extremely. And it's the kind of attitude that makes people who need help less likely to get it, and to feel ashamed that they do. How dare you accuse people struggling from a known illness of being addicts because they need medication to function and live normal lives. "Not going to feel good"? Try suicidal. Homicidal. Infanticidal. I lived with an unmedicated mother for my first 18 years. How dare you suggest that she's only a good mother and grandmother now because she's an addict. Seriously. Get the fuck over yourself.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 07:03 pm (UTC)I'm one of the chemically-imbalanced, though. Cymbalta is actually prescribed on-label for two conditions: depression and peripheral neuropathy (PN). Along with Lyrica, the only other med specifically designated for treatment of PN, Cymbalta has alleviated my chronic pain on a long-term basis. It works for me, too, as an anti-depressant.
Some side effects suck. I truly believe that I've had memory loss from long-term Cymbalta use. The sexual side effects are more difficult to quantify. Longer to reach orgasm, and sometimes I'm non-orgasmic -- but when I do ring the bell, it's like a switch has turned on and I can lather-rinse-repeat for hours.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 09:09 pm (UTC)Eventually, all the places they might work become points of failure. A new medication or medication combination is needed to exploit alternative trigger points.
I do not want to wade into the debate on addiction. I know which drugs I can... and can not... take without suffering "side effects" if I stop again.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-19 10:57 pm (UTC)Which isn't to say that I think meds are under-prescribed. But I think a lot of mild to moderate cases of mood issues are getting pills when they need therapy - not to mention a ton of people with biological health issues, like pain, which get called 'depression' as a convenient label.
Cymbalta actually has an on-label for fibromyalgia now. I am not convinced that it's any more effective than the handful of cheaper, older antidepressants which many fibro people take offlabel for nerve pain, but this lets the Cymbalta people make money. Still, I'll take the research and add it to the stack; we'll take all the pain research we can get, even funded by chemical salesmen.
There are different chemical flavors of depression. In my case, my depression appears to be norepinephrine rather then the usually assumed dopamine. Dopamine antidepressants make me worse, and if I hadn't done my research I'd have been either cycling or off the drugs and not getting the help I needed, because therapy never made a dent. Cycling doesn't mean the drugs aren't right, but it may. There's also a lot of people who cycle through meds saying that the first one didn't work, when in fact it's likely to be a compliance issue.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 01:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 01:44 am (UTC)I'm one of those people who for sure, absolutely has a chemical issue. And the drugs don't stop working.
They never work in the first place. So I take nothing. Same result, fewer side effects.
Frankly, I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 01:56 am (UTC)But it's not addiction, it's dependence. Which is actually different. You can see either dependence or addiction with pain meds, one is the natural consequence of chronic use, and the other is a problem and involves abuse and not following the proper instructions. But there's other meds people are dependent on as well, it's just that antidepressants are WAY overused.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 03:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-11-20 05:15 pm (UTC)For myself, yes, there's something obviously chemical going on. How much is thyroid and how much is neurochemistry, who knows at this point? Therapy has never done much for me. Lexapro was a godsend, as was Celexa (which I went on only because it was cheaper) to a lesser extent. Don't know why he put me on Trazodone, but glad I'm off of it.
That's not to say that there aren't issues to deal with, but dealing with them is less effective without medication of some type.
Just so you know, though, I'm hoping that thyroid meds help the moods without the need for an actual antidepressant.
I don't know if that makes any sense.
(no subject)
From: