Submitted for further examination.
Oct. 14th, 2005 01:31 pmThe whole "women having children" issue.
Since I hadn't see it anywhere on the FL this morning -
This woman:

Is in jail, no bail. Why?
This woman:

Is the hospital after an emergency c-section was completed, and remains in critical condition.
Pennsylvania State Police said Peggy Jo Conner attacked her neighbor, Valerie Oskin, in Oskin's trailer early Wednesday. Conner then drove Oskin, who was eight months pregnant, about 15 miles to a remote area and tried to cut through a C-section scar on her abdomen with a razor blade. Oskin has a 7-year-old son.
I see a lot of discussion about the woman who's had her 16th baby - and everyone looks hale, healthy and well-groomed in the few photographs you can see.
Wealth comes in a lot of forms - I keep repeating that money is not the only currency people deal in.
The two stories are tied together in that it's women having babies - or NOT having babies - that's at issue.
And until we address the innate issue of valuing a female life based on that fact, we won't make much headway on many of the other issues.
I'm sure there's a huge rant in here someplace. But I need to keep it simple because, well, no time.
Who's at fault?
The person doing the deed. First person who blames a man in either of these cases, looses influence points. Big time.
(The 16 kids look like the product of improved living conditions, BTW. They look like the product of a lot of conditions being met, including the social network to support such an undertaking. You can bet the two adults are NOT doing this alone.)
And it's shallow and very callous, but is it my imagination or is the criminal significantly uglier than the victim? Is having a baby that much an leveler in that regard? It really does something for the argument that women having children because of some deficiency in their self-esteem will not succeed, doesn't it?
Sad. Unbelieveably...there just are no words.
Since I hadn't see it anywhere on the FL this morning -
This woman:

Is in jail, no bail. Why?
This woman:

Is the hospital after an emergency c-section was completed, and remains in critical condition.
Pennsylvania State Police said Peggy Jo Conner attacked her neighbor, Valerie Oskin, in Oskin's trailer early Wednesday. Conner then drove Oskin, who was eight months pregnant, about 15 miles to a remote area and tried to cut through a C-section scar on her abdomen with a razor blade. Oskin has a 7-year-old son.
I see a lot of discussion about the woman who's had her 16th baby - and everyone looks hale, healthy and well-groomed in the few photographs you can see.
Wealth comes in a lot of forms - I keep repeating that money is not the only currency people deal in.
The two stories are tied together in that it's women having babies - or NOT having babies - that's at issue.
And until we address the innate issue of valuing a female life based on that fact, we won't make much headway on many of the other issues.
I'm sure there's a huge rant in here someplace. But I need to keep it simple because, well, no time.
Who's at fault?
The person doing the deed. First person who blames a man in either of these cases, looses influence points. Big time.
(The 16 kids look like the product of improved living conditions, BTW. They look like the product of a lot of conditions being met, including the social network to support such an undertaking. You can bet the two adults are NOT doing this alone.)
And it's shallow and very callous, but is it my imagination or is the criminal significantly uglier than the victim? Is having a baby that much an leveler in that regard? It really does something for the argument that women having children because of some deficiency in their self-esteem will not succeed, doesn't it?
Sad. Unbelieveably...there just are no words.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:02 pm (UTC)But that doesn't mean the same as 'awful white trash horrible baby factory' still. *sigh*
I think I've ranted enough for four people on the subject today already, really.
As to that story? Sad.
And very 'yes' that being able to have/having babies shouldn't be kept as what defines women as women anymore, and that is what needs addressing, instead of namecalling and violence.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-16 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:03 pm (UTC)Seriously though, why would someone WANT to have 16 children? What mindset do they get in? Not to mention the women going through labor 16 times! Reminds me of that one bit from Monty Python's The Meaning of Life when the lady is washing dishes then *plop* out comes another baby!
I wonder if they only had that many children so they COULD be famous. Guiness Book of World Records and such. The publicity alone is what puts food on the table...
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:11 pm (UTC)About the attacker's appearance
Date: 2005-10-14 09:20 pm (UTC)Re: About the attacker's appearance
Date: 2005-10-14 09:42 pm (UTC)Of course, that won't stop most people from taking one look at the picture and quickly assessing: "ugly, inside and out", without even knowing why she did what she did. That is to say, I'm not inclined to condone what she did, it's horrible and horrifying, but I'm going to reserve my judgment on whether there was any tenuous justification to that woman's actions until and unless she gets to tell a jury about it.
Re: About the attacker's appearance
Date: 2005-10-17 02:19 pm (UTC)In all my years driving, I never "gussied-up" for a driver's license. I'm looking at bone structure, weight - and age.
It shouldn't matter what you look like. When it does - and someone takes action like this because they don't look like something out of fashion magazine...or as good as the neighbor...something is very, very wrong.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:39 pm (UTC)While they do get some help from people in their church, they handle everything on their own for the most part. They have quite a system down where the kids are basically broken into teams with one of the older kids in charge of making sure a middle-aged child helps her with the one or two babies they are assigned to watch. All the girls have white socks and all the boys have black socks to make laundry easier. Every week or two, they load everyone into the family bus and go clean out an Aldi's. Meals there are produced on an industrial level. It's actually kind of impressive, even though I think they're insane for doing it.
In closing, insert standard "if you want so many children, how about adopting unwanted kids" rant here.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 09:53 pm (UTC)*nods emphatically* Seems to me that would be the Lord's work.
What I think bothers me most is thinking about what kind of life the elder children must have. Do they get any socialization outside of blood relatives?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 10:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-14 10:11 pm (UTC)Out of context with any consideration of the two women's looks, but in my experience, yes, having a baby is a huge leveller. And if your self-esteem is on the low side, it will come back and bite you on the bum, big-time.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-15 03:28 am (UTC)That silliness said, women who have babies are of all physical appearances, and women who hurt people are of all physical appearances. I don't think traditionally unattractive women are any more likely to seek childbearing than attractive women, at least in my experience. Perhaps when this woman went beserk, she picked an attractive woman because she was jealous of her for more than her pregnancy. But as someone's pointed out, it's a freakin' mug shot. I have seen thousands of mug shots in my line of work, and Julia Roberts would look like a hag. Remember Nick Nolte's DUI mug? Uh huh.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 02:21 pm (UTC)They're both mug shots. And frankly, they're both awful -
no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-17 02:22 pm (UTC)"Nothing without a man." That's what I smell.