For your perusal -
Aug. 29th, 2006 12:25 pmA couple of shots from Saturday - I think I have the one we're going to use, but there's no fun in that.
Here's to pictures that don't suck!
Which one do you like more?

-or-

I really wanted to stay away from a formal portrait - here, look at this poor desperate couple! Give 'em a kid! - so I went for the less than stellar situation. I think they're pretty good shots, all told.
Here's to pictures that don't suck!
Which one do you like more?

-or-

I really wanted to stay away from a formal portrait - here, look at this poor desperate couple! Give 'em a kid! - so I went for the less than stellar situation. I think they're pretty good shots, all told.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:39 pm (UTC)The second is great because of the way you're interacting witht eh Lorikeet.
Still. I vote pic #1!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:48 pm (UTC)*like
*With The
Typo Gremlins. Horrible infestation.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:40 pm (UTC)They're both good in their own ways. If you'd like more emphasis on the bird, I'd go with the second.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:46 pm (UTC)I like the second one better.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 07:52 pm (UTC)First one.
Date: 2006-08-29 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:04 pm (UTC):-)
no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 08:34 pm (UTC)Just a quick fix, but I like this one better.
the 1st
Date: 2006-08-29 08:58 pm (UTC)I like you both smiling at the camera.
1st one
Date: 2006-08-29 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-29 11:13 pm (UTC)Here's what else picture 1 says - you're not afraid to try things/expose yourselves to interesting situations, and you're not homebodies. The kid behind your shoulder,
kyburg, in the backpack carrier shows that you weren't somewhere "dangerous," per se.
The second picture, the unkind would say Jim looks drunk and is that a beer he's holding? (No, he's holding a cup of birdseed or the like for the 'keets. I know that.) And your expression is "Duh... wuzzat?"
Picture 1 is the better impression to put into a filefolder.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 01:07 am (UTC)*wry* And one of them wasn't me. ;)
C.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:43 am (UTC)There's no way the 2nd shot should be used.
# 1
Date: 2006-08-30 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 04:41 am (UTC)The second is a nice "candid" shot and would be great, say, in a magazine article, but for the purposes of introducing yourself to someone, the first one presents you as much more personable and engaging people (the second sorta conveys an impression that you're more interested in the bird than in any people who might be in front of you, which has a bit of an antisocial vibe, IMHO)
And I wouldn't be worried about the bird blur. In my opinion that just makes it more clear that it wasn't some staged shot where you were worried about getting everything "just right" (that's exactly the sort of thing I'd expect to see in an ordinary photo from a family outing).
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 05:41 am (UTC)You're so cute!