kyburg: (Default)
[personal profile] kyburg
Roberts lost a child of his own three years ago and "that had something to do with his state of mind," Mr Miller said.

"He was angry with life and he may have been angry with God for having lost a child.

"It appears he chose this school because it was close to his home, it had the female victims he was looking for and it probably seemed easier to get into than some bigger school."


Don't look for reasons. You won't find any that will make any sense.

But as the story develops, I'm finding myself not surprised by what is found.

"Once the police entered the building they found a cache of weapons and supplies that indicated Roberts had prepared for a long siege.

They included the nine millimetre semi-automatic pistol, two shotguns, a stun gun, two knives, two cans of gunpowder and 600 rounds of ammunition.

In a toolbox near his body, police discovered bolts he had used to barricade the school doors, pliers and wires he had used to bind the girls' legs. A bucket he brought into the building contained earplugs, toilet paper and a clean change of clothing, the police said."


W.
T.
F.

Friends and co-workers had noted a change in mood - and then, suddenly - it was gone. Like he'd made a decision he was happy with - much like any other person who comes to a conclusion to commit suicide and has finished their plan.

Even MSN's splash pages are reporting much the same. "10 Myths About School Shootings." My favorite?

Myth No. 2. “He just snapped.”

Uh, no.

Rarely were incidents of school violence sudden, impulsive acts. Attackers do not “just snap,” but progress from forming an idea, to planning an attack, to gathering weapons. This process can happen quickly, but sometimes the planning or gathering weapons are discoverable.

McVey, anyone?

--

And so, Foley has checked in rehab? For treatment of pedophilia? Alcoholism?! You gotta be shitting me.

Oh, please. Wrong end, Charlie.

Date: 2006-10-03 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
Not to be technical or anything, but as far as I know, Foley hasn't done anything to indicate pedophilia--attraction to children, defined in the psychological literature as people under the age of puberty, when one is more than 5 years older than them.

Attraction to 16 and 17 yr olds is defined in the psychological literature as 'normal'.

Date: 2006-10-03 05:53 pm (UTC)
ext_20420: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kyburg.livejournal.com
Oh that's right. Teenagers are "small adults."

Uh, no. Attraction is normal - but not between adults who have reached their significant majority, and children.

And yes. Anyone under the age of 18 is a child. Appearances notwithstanding, and age-appropriate development as well.

Date: 2006-10-03 06:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
Teenagers aren't small adults--most of them are bigger than me. They are teenagers. That time period between childhood and adulthood.

If you think a 17 yr old is at the same level of mental development as a 7 yr old, I'm sorry, but they're not. In most societies a 17 yr old is almost fully independent, if not considered a complete adult. They can drive, hold a job, get married, etc.

The only relevant definitions in this case are those set by the DSM IV, which sets the definition of pedophilia:

"The paraphilic focus of Pedophilia involves sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger). The individual with Pedophilia must be age 16 years or older and at least 5 years older than the child."


Attraction to a 16 or 17 year old is not pedophilia in even the remotest sense of the word's actual definition. Pretending that 16 or 17 yr olds are at the same mental and physical development level of 6 or 7 year olds is infantilizing and offensive.

Date: 2006-10-03 07:02 pm (UTC)
ext_120327: (Default)
From: [identity profile] dracowayfarer.livejournal.com
Attraction to 16 and 17 yr olds is defined in the psychological literature as 'normal'.

1. Can you back up this claim?

2. Doesn't matter what any psych lit says about the behavior. The law says if you're under 18, you're a child in the eyes of a judge and jury.

Date: 2006-10-03 07:41 pm (UTC)
ext_120327: (Default)
From: [identity profile] dracowayfarer.livejournal.com
I see you presented some evidence in response to [livejournal.com profile] kyburg, probably as I was typing my comment. So, nevermind on my first point. :)
From: [identity profile] moropus.livejournal.com
We need a federal law defining 18 as the age of consent and the earliest possible marriagable age, parental consent for younger kids needs to go out the window.

I'm card-carrying mentally ill and when I feel ill, I see my doctor. I take responsibility for my actions. I take medications so I can function. The goobers are not helping the mentally ill community by making mental illness an excuse for everything.

They used to get wrapped up in people wearing black clothes. I have a lot of black clothes because I don't do fashion, I spill stuff, black goes with everything and is good for all occasions except a wedding. I have a black trench coat because my mom got tired of me wearing all my windbreakers at the same time and bought me one. She's of retirement age and has no concept of black clothes meaning you're going to kill people. She thinks it's highly conservative. So do I. But I have had to talk to shrinks and people I work for about my life-long habit of wearing black a lot because of these stupid myths.

The man did not just snap. He went out and acquired a whole lot of stuff to commit his crime with.

Foley has no excuse either. He is allegedly guilty of sexual harrassment in the workplace and supplying alcohol to minors. Now people are bringing up Bill Clinton and Monica. At least she was old enough to be a college graduate.

Sorry for the hijack. Just so mad at excuses.
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
By itself, an AOC of 18 for sex generally doesn't work very well, for the simple reason that 16 yr olds have lots of sex, all the time, and making it illegal will just make them less likely to get birth control.
From: [identity profile] moropus.livejournal.com
It's illegal to use electronic means to proposition teens but legal to have sex with them. I think we need a little work on that inconsistancy. I could see it being legal for 16 yr olds to have sex with each other, but not with somebody old enough to be their father. Or maybe their parents could just keep an eye on them and know what they are up to like my parents did. My parents always knew where I was. They called to check up on me and worked hard to keep me safe from predators. They treated parenting like hard work instead of just a thing they could shrug off.
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
It's illegal to use electronic means to proposition teens but legal to have sex with them.

Those are the kind of laws which make me want to hit things. It shouldn't make any difference legally whether you say 'hey, wanna fuck' in person or on AIM.

I'm pretty much in favor of parents being parents. (Like yours. Good for them.)

Date: 2006-10-04 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
1. The proper term for sexual attraction to a teenager is 'ephebophilia' or more rarely, 'hebophilia'. Neither term is even in the DSM IV because they are not considered psychiatric disorders.

In other words, ephobiliacs are considered 'normal' in the psychiatric literature.

If we went around trying to put every man who lusted after a 17 yr old female in a psychiatric ward, we'd have to lock up almost half the country.



2. We aren't discussing law, we're discussing pedophilia, which is a psychiatric term with a very specific definition, part of which is that the 'child' must be below the age of puberty/13.

As for what the law says, please read up on the age of consent laws, since we are discussing matters of sex, not voting. They vary from state to state, and most of them are not set at 18.

Date: 2006-10-04 03:33 am (UTC)
ext_120327: (Default)
From: [identity profile] dracowayfarer.livejournal.com
1. If we went around trying to put every man who lusted after a 17 yr old female in a psychiatric ward, we'd have to lock up almost half the country.

I'm aware of this. What I was asking for, however, was proof that the definition of pedophilia is what you claimed it was, and not just something you heard somewhere from someone.

2. I live in California and was not aware that other states have different age of consent laws. I've always heard 18, and never anything different.

Date: 2006-10-04 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moropus.livejournal.com
It's not the actual thought, the lust, it's the acting on it. You can lust after all kinds of people and keep your pants on and kep your thoughts to yourself. It's called personal responsibility, a thing in rare supply these days.

Date: 2006-10-04 11:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kiyone.livejournal.com
As I recalled, the age of consent for m-f sex in Nevada is 16 (being from Nevada, I always clearly recall this particular one). Same with many states. I just remember having to look it up years ago and the page still exists.

Here's a list.

Date: 2006-10-05 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/little_e_/
1. I already quoted the DSM IV entry on pedophilia. What more proof do you want?

2. Part of my thesis covered the development of AOC laws. They vary a *lot*. People believe that the AOC is 18 because all of the federal laws regarding sex use 18 because that's the most conservative age limit. The result is idiocy like the 16 yr old girl in Rhode Island who was put in jail for creating 'child pornography' of herself. Never mind that the AOC in Rhode Island is 16, so the things she photographed were completely legal...

It ought to be a basic responsibility for Americans to know the laws they live under, but unfortunately, there are just too many laws.

Amish School

Date: 2006-10-03 07:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] djdig.livejournal.com
The guy who shot up the Amish school also had lube in the stuff he brough with him according to comcast news: http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/10/03/490737.html&cvqh=itn_amish

*shutter*

Date: 2006-10-03 08:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blukat.livejournal.com
I have a feeling this guy had wanted to do something for some time, but wasn't sure how he was going to carry it out, the details, until he saw about the previous school attack.

and that is very true, many people who have been contemplating suicide will go from depression to seeming okay, because they are "happy" they have made that final decision, that they think they will finally be released from their pain, it will be all over. That is the thing to watch for if anyone has someone who suffers from depression. When they start saying everything is okay, that they are fine.

of course he went into rehab...

Date: 2006-10-03 11:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tomlemos.livejournal.com
that way, they can say "oh look, he's all better" when the time comes.

It also makes it look like he's not responsible for his actions if he can point to rehab and say "wow, I was messed up but I'm all better."

He's got damn good handlers, that's all I can say.

wow. He'll get off easy.

Profile

kyburg: (Default)
kyburg

March 2021

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 12:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios