Okay, that's better -
Nov. 12th, 2002 04:11 pm*exhale*
Not a detached retina. Not a retinal tear. No macular degeneration.
Doctor says it looks like she might have had a little interruption in blood flow to part of the eye - like a mini-heart attack, only this was in the retina. She already says she sees better, and the doctor says she should get most if not all back, even if over a period of months.
So much for opthomologists in Hemet. Loma Linda, bayyyybee!
Me, I'm for Jules Stein at UCLA. I know better. Feh.
Scare my mommy, willya? Why, I oughtaaa --
*goes into full Donald Duck mode*
Not a detached retina. Not a retinal tear. No macular degeneration.
Doctor says it looks like she might have had a little interruption in blood flow to part of the eye - like a mini-heart attack, only this was in the retina. She already says she sees better, and the doctor says she should get most if not all back, even if over a period of months.
So much for opthomologists in Hemet. Loma Linda, bayyyybee!
Me, I'm for Jules Stein at UCLA. I know better. Feh.
Scare my mommy, willya? Why, I oughtaaa --
*goes into full Donald Duck mode*