Good morning!
Dec. 29th, 2010 10:10 amI just nudged a buttload of people. Yo, my bad. Hey, I miss you guys.
RANT MODE=ON
A standout season has done plenty to calm the controversy surrounding quarterback Michael Vick. But President Obama's praise of the Philadelphia Eagles for giving the convicted dogfighter a second chance has brought new energy to an old firestorm.
You know, if you say anything about Michael Vick, you are asking for a major flaming. Seriously. There is very little middle ground when discussing all the circumstances surrounding him.
Well, flame on, says I. Go right ahead. Have a weenie roast while you're at it.
Outside of making a case against yourself, projecting your issues onto the wider stage and basically using a public figure to make your personal arguments, this isn't doing a single dog any good, making Vick another dollar or bringing a football team any more publicity that it could do all on its own.
There are a lot of people who think Vick should be killed for what he did.
That's not an option.
That he shouldn't be making a dime off his chosen profession. (Tonya Harding, anyone?)
People want to get paid, folks. Also, off the table.
He's never going to get another chance to do it again, guys. Let alone want to, need to or be any party to a single dogfight ever again. You remember that warning about your life only serving to be a warning to others? Yeah. That.
I doubt I'd walk across the street to tell him this, though. Nope, don't want to.
The dogs that survived the experience - which normally, would have been put down 'as a matter of policy' if they had been in Los Angeles? Jim Gorant wrote a book on them. 49 out of 51 are homed, often within families. Amazing. (But not altogether so if you know anything about the breed. Pibbles are incredible.)
We are giving the dogs more opportunity for rehabilitation than we are the people involved. Don't you think that's a little uneven? At least?
You want to castigate Vick, go right ahead. While you're at it, call out the people who run puppy mills for profit, okay? (My personal peeve.)
Find some money for the local shelter. All the ones near me - and all the rescues - are so impacted it's beyond reason.
It's easy to vilify Vick. So easy. It's harder to do something useful, going forward. Why, that would be WORK, for crying out loud.
So have your entertainment at the expense of a public figure who is clearly identified, tried and convicted (but served his time - more than I would have expected, but that's a story for another day) for things that are a matter of public record, and are not discussed around children. That awful.
Go for it.
When you're done? Do something useful with the time you have left over. Thanks.
RANT MODE=OFF
RANT MODE=ON
A standout season has done plenty to calm the controversy surrounding quarterback Michael Vick. But President Obama's praise of the Philadelphia Eagles for giving the convicted dogfighter a second chance has brought new energy to an old firestorm.
You know, if you say anything about Michael Vick, you are asking for a major flaming. Seriously. There is very little middle ground when discussing all the circumstances surrounding him.
Well, flame on, says I. Go right ahead. Have a weenie roast while you're at it.
Outside of making a case against yourself, projecting your issues onto the wider stage and basically using a public figure to make your personal arguments, this isn't doing a single dog any good, making Vick another dollar or bringing a football team any more publicity that it could do all on its own.
There are a lot of people who think Vick should be killed for what he did.
That's not an option.
That he shouldn't be making a dime off his chosen profession. (Tonya Harding, anyone?)
People want to get paid, folks. Also, off the table.
He's never going to get another chance to do it again, guys. Let alone want to, need to or be any party to a single dogfight ever again. You remember that warning about your life only serving to be a warning to others? Yeah. That.
I doubt I'd walk across the street to tell him this, though. Nope, don't want to.
The dogs that survived the experience - which normally, would have been put down 'as a matter of policy' if they had been in Los Angeles? Jim Gorant wrote a book on them. 49 out of 51 are homed, often within families. Amazing. (But not altogether so if you know anything about the breed. Pibbles are incredible.)
We are giving the dogs more opportunity for rehabilitation than we are the people involved. Don't you think that's a little uneven? At least?
You want to castigate Vick, go right ahead. While you're at it, call out the people who run puppy mills for profit, okay? (My personal peeve.)
Find some money for the local shelter. All the ones near me - and all the rescues - are so impacted it's beyond reason.
It's easy to vilify Vick. So easy. It's harder to do something useful, going forward. Why, that would be WORK, for crying out loud.
So have your entertainment at the expense of a public figure who is clearly identified, tried and convicted (but served his time - more than I would have expected, but that's a story for another day) for things that are a matter of public record, and are not discussed around children. That awful.
Go for it.
When you're done? Do something useful with the time you have left over. Thanks.
RANT MODE=OFF